<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">JSSS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">JSSS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">J. Sens. Sens. Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2194-878X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/jsss-10-121-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Determination of optimal crystallographic orientations for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bimorph actuators</article-title><alt-title>Determination of optimal crystallographic orientations</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Determination of optimal crystallographic orientations}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{O. Buryy et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Buryy</surname><given-names>Oleh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Syvorotka</surname><given-names>Ihor I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Suhak</surname><given-names>Yuriy</given-names></name>
          <email>yuriy.suhak@tu-clausthal.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yakhnevych</surname><given-names>Uliana</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sugak</surname><given-names>Dmytro</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ubizskii</surname><given-names>Sergii</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Fritze</surname><given-names>Holger</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Semiconductors Electronics Department, Lviv Polytechnic National
University, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Scientific Research Company “Electron-Carat”, Lviv, 79031, Ukraine</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute for Energy Research and Physical Technologies, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Clausthal
University of Technology, 38640, Goslar, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yuriy Suhak (yuriy.suhak@tu-clausthal.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>121</fpage><lpage>126</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Oleh Buryy et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021.html">This article is available from https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e166">The actuators for precise positioning based on bimorph
structures of piezoelectric LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> crystals are
considered. The optimal orientations of the actuator plates ensuring the
highest possible displacements are determined by the extreme surfaces
technique and the finite-element method. The simulated displacements for optimal orientations of LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plates are compared with
those obtained experimentally for manufactured LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> actuators, whose orientations are not optimal. As is shown, the optimal configuration of the actuator allows us to significantly increase its displacement
for both LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> specimens.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page122?><p id="d1e251">The systems for precise positioning are widely used to ensure high accuracy,
linearity and reproducibility of the small movements of probes in scanning
probe microscopes, micro-electromechanical systems, micro-dispensers,
micro-motors for surgery, laser gyroscopes, mechanisms for laser resonator
adjusting, piezo-drives for control systems of car suspensions and lamps,
etc. (see, e.g., Segel, 2012; Uchino, 2017; Vijaya, 2017). To date, the most frequently used material for electromechanical actuators is the lead
zirconate titanate-based piezo-ceramics (PbZr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ti<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PZT). However, this material reveals two main fundamental properties which can
limit its use. Firstly, the presence of lead in its composition prevents
application of PZT in medicine. It is therefore necessary to note that in
accordance with the regulations of the EU, lead-containing compounds are not allowed to be used in technical devices in the near future (Panda, 2009).
Secondly, the low values of Curie temperature in PZT do not allow
application of ceramic actuators at the temperatures higher than 300<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, searching for new lead-free materials operating at high
temperatures is continuously performed. In this regard, piezoelectric
ferroelectric crystals, particularly lithium niobate (LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
lithium tantalate (LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), can be considered an alternative to PZT under certain operating conditions. More than 30 years of investigations
have proven the use of LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-based actuators (Nakamura et al., 1989, 1995; Ueda et al., 1990; Wakatsuki et al., 1998; Randles et al., 2006; Kawamata et al., 2007; Antipov et al., 2008; Matsunami et al.,
2008; Bykov et al., 2014; Shur et al., 2015; Kubasov et al., 2016; Turutin
et al., 2018; Buryy et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2020), in particular
in medicine (Randles et al., 2006). The active elements of LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-based actuators could be manufactured in the form of bimorph crystalline plates
(Nakamura et al., 1989, 1995; Ueda et al., 1990; Kawamata
et al., 2007; Antipov et al., 2008; Bykov et al., 2014; Shur et al., 2015;
Kubasov et al., 2016; Turutin et al., 2018; Buryy et al., 2019), multi-layer
structures (Matsunami et al., 2008) and thin films (Jiang et al., 2020).
These crystals possess many advantages compared to PZT, namely, higher Curie temperature, the virtual absence of hysteresis and creep, and weak
dependences of the piezoelectric constants on temperature (Antipov et al., 2008; Shur et al., 2015). The main drawback of LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to PZT is the lower value of piezoelectric constants by approximately an order of magnitude.</p>
      <p id="d1e350">To increase the extent of deformation under the influence of the electric
field, bimorph structures can be used. Such structures are formed by two
bonded plates of piezoelectric crystals in such a way that the vectors of polarization (or its components) of both parts are anti-parallel and
perpendicular to the bonding interface between them. In other words, such a configuration is a bidomain structure, which functions in accordance
with the bimorph principle: applying a voltage leads simultaneously to the
expansion of one layer and compression of the other layer; as the result,
the element bends (Shur et al., 2015). Lithium niobate bimorph plates can be
manufactured by a few techniques, i.e., by the thermo-chemical formation of the so-called inverse layer on a surface of a single-domain LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plate (Nakamura et al., 1989), by the electro-thermal method, particularly during infrared heating (Antipov et al., 2008; Bykov et al., 2014), and by direct
bonding of high-quality polished and cleaned plates (Shur et al., 2015). We
have manufactured such a bimorph structure using two lithium niobate plates
bonded by means of diffusion, using copper from films deposited on the
surfaces of the plates as a diffusant (Buryy et al., 2019). In this paper
the orientations of connected crystalline plates were chosen in such a way that the perpendicular to the surfaces of the plates coincided with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">128</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) directions. The chosen orientations were not optimal;
however, it is known that in anisotropic crystals, including LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the phenomena of interaction of internal and external physical fields could
be described by complex surfaces (see, e.g., Buryy et al., 2013). The developed methods of construction of such surfaces enable determination of optimal crystal cuts corresponding to the maxima of displacement.</p>
      <p id="d1e398">It should also be noted that lithium tantalate crystals are isostructural and close in properties to LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and, therefore, could
also potentially be used for production of actuators. However, to the best
of our knowledge, there are no experimental or theoretical works where
application of LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for actuator manufacturing was considered.</p>
      <p id="d1e419">This work focuses on the determination of optimal spatial orientations of
crystalline LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plates for actuating applications to ensure the highest possible displacement of such actuators.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Optimization procedure</title>
      <p id="d1e448">The considered design of the actuator is shown in Fig. 1. The unit vector
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is parallel to the long edges of the bimorph (and perpendicular
to the plane where the bimorph is fixed). The electric field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
applied along the short edges of the bimorph: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the unit
vector that determines the direction of the electric field.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e505">The bimorph actuator and the vectors that determine its geometry, directions of plate expansion/compression and the direction of the applied electric field.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e514">Let us consider one plate of the bimorph separately. Under the influence of the electric field, its deformation can be described by tensor
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M35" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the tensor of piezoelectric coefficients. The
relative expansion of the plate along the vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is equal to
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        and, as is seen from Eq. (2), depends on the directions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the absolute displacement of the plate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in case
of plate expansion and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in case of plate compression, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the actuator length. Therefore the directions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which maximize the value of relative expansion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, must
be determined in order to optimize the actuator. Despite lithium niobate and
lithium tantalate being crystals of sufficiently high symmetry (trigonal), here we intentionally solve the optimization problem in the most general formulation, while the same approach could also be used in future for
low-symmetry crystalline materials, too.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e742">The extreme surfaces for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>
crystals (isometric and top views). All values on the axes are in pC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e784">The optimal orientations of bimorph plates for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and
LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the axes of the crystal-physics system of coordinates.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page123?><p id="d1e839">The optimization was performed using the approach developed for the analysis of induced and nonlinear optical effects in crystals (see, e.g., Buryy et al., 2013). This approach is based on the construction and analysis of the special-type (extreme) surfaces. Such surfaces comprise all possible maxima of the investigated effect which are achieved by
determination of the optimal orientations of the determinant factor (electric field) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all possible directions of crystal orientation
determined by vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. If the direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined
by the angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the spherical coordinate system and the direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by the angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the objective function of the optimization)
will depend on four variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Now for each pair of angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we can determine such angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which maximize the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Obviously, these
angles depend on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be considered a function of two variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dependence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be represented as a surface; the designation
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” used here emphasizes that the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained after maximizing on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(parameters of the optimization). In accordance with the rule of
determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use the term “extreme” for such a surface. Thus the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determines the length of the radius vector of this surface for the given direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The angles
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are varied during the optimization process in
such a manner that the condition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always
fulfilled; i.e., the vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> rotates in the plane perpendicular to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Subsequently, the piezoelectric extreme surface is given by
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M104" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vector from a set of vectors
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which maximize the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the fixed direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The piezoelectric coefficients used in these
calculations are indicated in Table 1. The extreme surfaces for both
LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> crystals are shown in Fig. 2. As is mentioned above, each point of the surface represents the maximal value of the
relative expansion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but
the highest possible expansions correspond to the global maxima of the relative expansion, which, in their turn, correspond to the points which are the
outermost from the origin of coordinates. The optimal directions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the corresponding values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicated in Table 1. It should be noted that alternatively the optimization can also be performed when the angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coincide with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered the variables. The obtained results for both optimization cases are the same; therefore, the latter case is not shown.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1633">The deformation of the actuator under the applied voltage
of 300 V (case i).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1646">The position and values of global maxima of the relative
elongation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> crystals.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Crystal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Piezoelectric coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Shaskolskaya, 1982)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">pC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">130</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">133</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1680">Only one set of the angles is given for each crystal. Other sets can be
obtained using the symmetry elements of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> point group (point group of crystals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> center of inversion).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2197">The displacements of actuators (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under the
excitation voltage of 300 V.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Crystal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Orientations </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Increasing </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Case (i)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Case (iii)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Case (ii)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(Case (ii)–case (i))/</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(Case (ii)–case (i))/</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Case (i)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Case (iii)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2541 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">364 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">67 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2345">Since the maximal displacement of the actuator occurs when one plate
maximally expands and the other one maximally compresses, the plates of the actuator have to be rotated relative to each other by 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the YOZ plane. It is equivalent to application of the electric field of the opposite
polarity to the plates. In this case the absolute values of<?pagebreak page124?> the displacement
will be exactly the same but with different signs. These optimal configurations of actuators are shown in Fig. 3. As is seen from the figure, they are almost similar for both LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: only
the angles of rotation around the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis show an insignificant difference (about 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2393">The dependencies of displacement on applied voltage for the
actuators based on LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Simulation of bimorph actuators</title>
      <p id="d1e2434">To determine the maximum extent of displacements of actuators, their
simulation by the finite-element method was performed. In this simulation the geometry of actuators is similar to that used in our previous work (Buryy et al., 2019): width (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), length (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of each plate are 15, 65 and 0.75 mm, respectively; see Fig. 4 (dependence of actuator displacements on its geometry is analyzed in Buryy et al., 2019). The simulated excitation voltages are in the range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 300 V. Three
different cases were considered: (i) the “initial” orientations of the
plates – crystallographic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes are perpendicular to the plates; (ii) the
optimal orientations indicated in Table 1; (iii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">127</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cuts for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> correspondingly.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2536">The dependencies of calculated displacement on applied voltage for
the optimized actuators based on LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/121/2021/jsss-10-121-2021-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2563">The cases for comparison were chosen for the following reasons. Case (i) corresponds to the orientation of the already manufactured LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-based actuator (Buryy et al., 2019). Moreover, in this paper the dependencies of
actuator displacements are theoretically analyzed with variations of
actuator length (from 10 to 80 mm) and thickness (from 0.4 to 2.4 mm). Since the main peculiarities of these dependencies were revealed in Buryy et al. (2019), we do not repeat the same analysis here. Case (ii)
corresponds to the optimal orientations determined in the current study (see Table 1). Case (iii) corresponds to the commercially available cuts of LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> characterized by the highest values of
transversal piezoelectric coefficients (Matsunami et al., 2008; Kubasov et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e2594">The results of the simulation, i.e., the absolute values of displacements of bimorph plates, are shown in Figs. 5–6 and indicated in Table 2. As well
as in Buryy et al. (2019), the dependencies of actuator displacement on excitation voltage are linear in all the studied voltage ranges, i.e., up to a field strength of 200 V/mm. As is shown, the optimal configuration of the actuator allows us to sufficiently increase the displacement value (with other
parameters fixed): the displacement is 26 times higher for lithium niobate
and 4.6 times higher for lithium tantalate compared to the actuator, studied in Buryy et al. (2019) (case (i)). Compared to the commercially
available plates (case (iii)), the displacement increases for about 11 %
for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 67 % for LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2615">The displacement of the LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> actuators with optimized orientation is
about 3 times higher compared to that of LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Fig. 6. However, the displacement of the LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> actuator is 2 times higher when case (ii) is considered. So, in case the use of z-cut plates is desired from the
technological point of view, the application LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is preferable.</p>
      <p id="d1e2654">The obtained simulation results will be used for preparation of bimorph
actuators with optimal orientations in the forthcoming research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2665">The actuators for precise positioning based on bimorph structure formed by
joining lithium niobate and lithium tantalate plates of different
crystallographic orientations are considered. To ensure the highest possible
displacements of the<?pagebreak page125?> actuator, the optimal orientations of their plates were
determined by the extreme surfaces technique. The possible absolute values of displacements are determined by simulation using the finite-element method. It is shown that the optimal orientations of the long edges of the actuator
plates are defined by the angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> crystal and by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The electric field is applied
in the directions determined by the angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">130</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">133</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The optimal
configuration of the actuator allows us to sufficiently increase its displacement (with other parameters fixed): in 26 times for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and in 4.6 times for LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the previously manufactured actuator with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes of the plates perpendicular to the surface of bonding. In comparison with the commercially available LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">127</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cut and LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cut, the displacement increases for about 11 % for LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 67 % for LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the optimized design, the
displacement of the LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> actuator is about 3 times higher than that of LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, for the case when the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes of the plates are perpendicular to the bonding surface, the displacement is twice as high for
the LiTaO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> actuator compared to LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3042">All relevant data presented in the article are stored according to institutional requirements and as such are not available online. However, all data used in this paper can be made available upon request to the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3048">OB developed the methodology and software and determined the optimal orientations of the actuator plates. IIS and DS developed the
design of the actuator. IIS and UY produced the
experimental sample of the actuator. YS and HF developed the
equipment and measured the actuator displacements. UY simulated
the bimorph actuator and calculated the absolute values of its
displacements. DS, SU and HF formulated the concept of
the work. OB, YS and DS prepared the manuscript with
contributions from all the co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3054">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3060">This article is part of the special issue “Sensors and Measurement Science International SMSI 2020”. It is a result of Sensor and Measurement Science International, Nuremberg, Germany, 22–-25 June 2020.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3066">The authors from Clausthal University of Technology were supported by the Energie-Forschungszentrum Niedersachsen, Goslar, Germany.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3071">The work was carried out in the framework of the joint German–Ukrainian project “Nanocrystalline piezoelectric compounds LiNb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ta<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for high-temperature applications” (M/48-2020) and project DB/MODUS (no. 0121U107736) of the Ukrainian Ministry of Education and Science. Further, research<?pagebreak page126?> grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, FR1301/42-1, SU1261/1-1) supported this work. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> This open-access publication was funded <?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?> by Clausthal University of Technology.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3114">This paper was edited by Stefan J. Rupitsch and reviewed by one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Antipov, V. V., Bykov, A. S., Malinkovich, M. D., and Parkhomenko, Y. N.:
Formation of bidomain structure in lithium niobate single crystals by
electrothermal method, Ferroelectrics, 374, 65–72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190802427127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00150190802427127</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buryy, O., Andrushchak, A., Kushnir, O., Ubizskii, S., Vynnyk, D.,
Yurkevych, O., Larchenko, A., Chaban, K., Gotra, O., and Kityk, A.: Method of extreme surfaces for optimizing the geometry of acousto-optic interactions
in crystalline materials: Example of LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> crystals, J. Appl. Phys.,
46, 083103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4792304</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buryy, O., Sugak, D., Syvorotka, I., Yakhnevich, U., Suhak, Yu., Ubizskii, S., and Fritze, H.: Simulation, making and testing of the actuator of precise positioning based on bimorph plate of lithium niobate, Proc. of IEEE
15th International Conference on the Perspective Technologies and
Methods in MEMS Design (MEMTECH), 22–26 May 2019, Polyana, Ukraine,
148–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSTECH.2019.8817401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/MEMSTECH.2019.8817401</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bykov, A. S., Grigoryan, S. G., Zhukov, R. N., Kiselev, D. A., Ksenich, S. V.,
Kubasov, I. V., Malinkovich, M. D., and Parkhomenko, Yu. N.: Formation of
bidomain structure in lithium niobate plates by the stationary external
heating method, Russ. Microelectronics, 43, 536–542, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063739714080034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S1063739714080034</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, W., Mayor, F. M., Patel, R. N., McKenna, T. P., Sarabalis, C. J., and Safavi-Naeini, A. H.: Nanobenders as efficient piezoelectric actuators for
widely tunable nanophotonics at CMOS-level voltages, Communications Physics,
3, 156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00412-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s42005-020-00412-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kawamata, A., Hosaka, H., and Morita, T.: Non-hysteresis and perfect linear
piezoelectric performance of a multilayered lithium niobate actuator, Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys., 135, 782–786, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.08.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sna.2006.08.025</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kubasov, I. V., Popov, A. V., Bykov, A. S., Temirov, A. A., Kislyuk, A. M.,
Zhukov, R. N., Kiselev, D. A., Chichkov, M. V., Malinkovich, M. D., and
Parkhomenko, Y. N.: Deformation anisotropy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">128</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-cut
single crystalline bidomain wafers of lithium niobate, Russ.
Microelectronics, 46, 557–563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063739717080108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S1063739717080108</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matsunami, Go, Kawamata, A., Hosaka, H., and Morita, T.: Multilayered LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> actuator for XY-stage using a shear piezoelectric effect,
Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys., 144, 337–340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2008.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sna.2008.02.006</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nakamura, K. and Shimizu, H.: Hysteresis-free piezoelectric actuators using
LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plates with a ferroelectric inversion layer, Ferroelectrics, 93,
211–216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198908017348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00150198908017348</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nakamura, K. and Yamada, K.: Ferroelectric domain inversion in LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
its application to high-precision piezoelectric actuators, MRS Proceedings,
360, 21–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1557/proc-360-21" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1557/proc-360-21</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Panda, P. K.: Review: environmental friendly lead-free piezoelectric
materials, Journal of Material Science, 44, 5049–5062,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3643-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10853-009-3643-0</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randles, A., Tanaka, S., and Esashi, M.: Lithium niobate bulk micromachining
for medical sensors, Future Medical Engineering Based on Bionanotechnology,
495–504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860948800_0054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/9781860948800_0054</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Segel, J. E.: Piezoelectric Actuators, New York, USA, Nova Science Publishers
Inc., Hauppauge, New York, USA, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shaskolskaya, M. P. (Ed.): Acoustic crystals, Moscow, Nauka, 1982 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shur, V. Ya., Baturin, I. S., Mingaliev, E. A., Zorikhin, D. V., Udalov, A. R.,
and Greshnyakov, E. D.: Hysteresis-free high-temperature precise bimorph
actuators produced by direct bonding of lithium niobate wafers, Appl. Phys.
Lett., 106, 053116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907679" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4907679</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turutin, A. V., Vidal, J. V., Kubasov, I. V., Kislyuk, A. M., Malinkovich, M. D.,
Parkhomenko, Yu. N., Kobeleva, S. P., Pakhomov, O. V., Kholkin, A. L., and
Sobolev, N. A.: Magnetoelectric metglas/bidomain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-cut
lithium niobate composite for sensing fT magnetic fields, Appl. Phys. Lett.,
112, 262906, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5038014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.5038014</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Uchino, K.: Ferroelectric Devices &amp; Piezoelectric Actuators. Research
Misconceptions and Rectifications, DeStech Publications, Inc., Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ueda, M., Sawada, H., Tanaka, A., and Wakatsuki, N.: Piezoelectric actuator
using a LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bimorph for an optical switch, IEEE Symposium on
Ultrasonics, 3, 1183–1186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1990.171548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/ULTSYM.1990.171548</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vijaya, M. S.: Piezoelectric Materials and Devices. Applications in
Engineering and Medical Science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wakatsuki, N., Yokoyama, H., and Kudo, S.: Piezoelectric actuator of
LiNbO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with an integrated displacement sensor, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 37,
2970–2973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.37.2970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1143/JJAP.37.2970</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Determination of optimal crystallographic orientations for LiNbO<sub>3</sub> and LiTaO<sub>3</sub> bimorph actuators</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The actuators for precise positioning based on bimorph
structures of piezoelectric LiNbO<sub>3</sub> and LiTaO<sub>3</sub> crystals are
considered. The optimal orientations of the actuator plates ensuring the
highest possible displacements are determined by the extreme surfaces
technique and the finite-element method. The simulated displacements for optimal orientations of LiNbO<sub>3</sub> and LiTaO<sub>3</sub> plates are compared with
those obtained experimentally for manufactured LiNbO<sub>3</sub> and LiTaO<sub>3</sub> actuators, whose orientations are not optimal. As is shown, the optimal configuration of the actuator allows us to significantly increase its displacement
for both LiNbO<sub>3</sub> and LiTaO<sub>3</sub> specimens.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Antipov, V. V., Bykov, A. S., Malinkovich, M. D., and Parkhomenko, Y. N.:
Formation of bidomain structure in lithium niobate single crystals by
electrothermal method, Ferroelectrics, 374, 65–72, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190802427127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190802427127</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Buryy, O., Andrushchak, A., Kushnir, O., Ubizskii, S., Vynnyk, D.,
Yurkevych, O., Larchenko, A., Chaban, K., Gotra, O., and Kityk, A.: Method of extreme surfaces for optimizing the geometry of acousto-optic interactions
in crystalline materials: Example of LiNbO<sub>3</sub> crystals, J. Appl. Phys.,
46, 083103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792304</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Buryy, O., Sugak, D., Syvorotka, I., Yakhnevich, U., Suhak, Yu., Ubizskii, S., and Fritze, H.: Simulation, making and testing of the actuator of precise positioning based on bimorph plate of lithium niobate, Proc. of IEEE
15th International Conference on the Perspective Technologies and
Methods in MEMS Design (MEMTECH), 22–26 May 2019, Polyana, Ukraine,
148–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSTECH.2019.8817401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSTECH.2019.8817401</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bykov, A. S., Grigoryan, S. G., Zhukov, R. N., Kiselev, D. A., Ksenich, S. V.,
Kubasov, I. V., Malinkovich, M. D., and Parkhomenko, Yu. N.: Formation of
bidomain structure in lithium niobate plates by the stationary external
heating method, Russ. Microelectronics, 43, 536–542, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063739714080034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063739714080034</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, W., Mayor, F. M., Patel, R. N., McKenna, T. P., Sarabalis, C. J., and Safavi-Naeini, A. H.: Nanobenders as efficient piezoelectric actuators for
widely tunable nanophotonics at CMOS-level voltages, Communications Physics,
3, 156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00412-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00412-3</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Kawamata, A., Hosaka, H., and Morita, T.: Non-hysteresis and perfect linear
piezoelectric performance of a multilayered lithium niobate actuator, Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys., 135, 782–786, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.08.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.08.025</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Kubasov, I. V., Popov, A. V., Bykov, A. S., Temirov, A. A., Kislyuk, A. M.,
Zhukov, R. N., Kiselev, D. A., Chichkov, M. V., Malinkovich, M. D., and
Parkhomenko, Y. N.: Deformation anisotropy of <i>Y</i> + 128°-cut
single crystalline bidomain wafers of lithium niobate, Russ.
Microelectronics, 46, 557–563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063739717080108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063739717080108</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Matsunami, Go, Kawamata, A., Hosaka, H., and Morita, T.: Multilayered LiNbO<sub>3</sub> actuator for XY-stage using a shear piezoelectric effect,
Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys., 144, 337–340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2008.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2008.02.006</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Nakamura, K. and Shimizu, H.: Hysteresis-free piezoelectric actuators using
LiNbO<sub>3</sub> plates with a ferroelectric inversion layer, Ferroelectrics, 93,
211–216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198908017348" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198908017348</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Nakamura, K. and Yamada, K.: Ferroelectric domain inversion in LiNbO<sub>3</sub> and
its application to high-precision piezoelectric actuators, MRS Proceedings,
360, 21–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1557/proc-360-21" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1557/proc-360-21</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Panda, P. K.: Review: environmental friendly lead-free piezoelectric
materials, Journal of Material Science, 44, 5049–5062,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3643-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3643-0</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Randles, A., Tanaka, S., and Esashi, M.: Lithium niobate bulk micromachining
for medical sensors, Future Medical Engineering Based on Bionanotechnology,
495–504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860948800_0054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860948800_0054</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Segel, J. E.: Piezoelectric Actuators, New York, USA, Nova Science Publishers
Inc., Hauppauge, New York, USA, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Shaskolskaya, M. P. (Ed.): Acoustic crystals, Moscow, Nauka, 1982 (in Russian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Shur, V. Ya., Baturin, I. S., Mingaliev, E. A., Zorikhin, D. V., Udalov, A. R.,
and Greshnyakov, E. D.: Hysteresis-free high-temperature precise bimorph
actuators produced by direct bonding of lithium niobate wafers, Appl. Phys.
Lett., 106, 053116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907679" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907679</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Turutin, A. V., Vidal, J. V., Kubasov, I. V., Kislyuk, A. M., Malinkovich, M. D.,
Parkhomenko, Yu. N., Kobeleva, S. P., Pakhomov, O. V., Kholkin, A. L., and
Sobolev, N. A.: Magnetoelectric metglas/bidomain <i>y</i> + 140°-cut
lithium niobate composite for sensing fT magnetic fields, Appl. Phys. Lett.,
112, 262906, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5038014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5038014</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Uchino, K.: Ferroelectric Devices &amp; Piezoelectric Actuators. Research
Misconceptions and Rectifications, DeStech Publications, Inc., Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Ueda, M., Sawada, H., Tanaka, A., and Wakatsuki, N.: Piezoelectric actuator
using a LiNbO<sub>3</sub> bimorph for an optical switch, IEEE Symposium on
Ultrasonics, 3, 1183–1186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1990.171548" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1990.171548</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Vijaya, M. S.: Piezoelectric Materials and Devices. Applications in
Engineering and Medical Science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Wakatsuki, N., Yokoyama, H., and Kudo, S.: Piezoelectric actuator of
LiNbO<sub>3</sub> with an integrated displacement sensor, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 37,
2970–2973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.37.2970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.37.2970</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
