<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">JSSS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">JSSS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">J. Sens. Sens. Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2194-878X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/jsss-15-141-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Development and optimization of an OF-CEAS system  for stable isotopic ratio analysis of   methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>) in the mid-infrared</article-title><alt-title>Development and optimization of an OF-CEAS system</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dinc</surname><given-names>Cem</given-names></name>
          <email>cem.dinc@imtek.uni-freiburg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2524-2471</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nitzsche</surname><given-names>Ponkanok</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Goldschmidt</surname><given-names>Jens</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Weber</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nitzsche</surname><given-names>Leonard</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Schmitt</surname><given-names>Katrin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4646-8990</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wöllenstein</surname><given-names>Jürgen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratory for Gas Sensors, Institute for Microsystems Engineering – IMTEK,   University of Freiburg, Georges-Köhler-Allee 102, 79110 Freiburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Fraunhofer Institute for Physical Measurement Techniques – IPM,   Georges-Köhler-Allee 301, 79110 Freiburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Cem Dinc (cem.dinc@imtek.uni-freiburg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>141</fpage><lpage>154</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Cem Dinc et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026.html">This article is available from https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e166">High-precision analysis of the stable isotopic composition of atmospheric methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is essential for attributing its sources and sinks and for a more precise understanding of the global methane cycle. Although conventional isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) provides high accuracy, it lacks in situ capabilities and provides only low data rates. Tunable laser spectrometers offer higher acquisition rates and high sensitivity. In accordance with the Beer–Lambert law, the absorption signal increases proportionally with the optical path length, requiring kilometer-scale paths for atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection and thus the use of optical cavities. Here, we present an optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (OF-CEAS) system for determining the isotopic ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the stable isotopologues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the mid-infrared range at 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (3333 nm wavelength). The optical setup comprises a high-finesse V-shaped cavity with highly reflective mirrors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.999893</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), resulting in a theoretically effective path length of 22.53 km, which is integrated into an Invar cell with active temperature and pressure stabilization. Allan deviation analysis of the temperature regulation shows a minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at an integration time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and for the gas temperature inside the cell, it gives a minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which shows thermal stability that is compatible with an uncertainty in the isotopic ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bergamaschi et al., 1994). Spectral measurements confirm active cavity locking, a symmetric mode structure and frequency calibration using a germanium etalon and a methane reference cell. The spectral resolution of the measurement is given by the free spectral range (FSR) of the cavity with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FSR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The system presented here demonstrates the stability and resolution required for high-precision isotopic methane analysis.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e375">The study of greenhouse gases such as methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is crucial to understanding the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on global warming and making accurate climate predictions. The current concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere is 1.9 ppm, a value that has doubled over the last 200 years and continues to rise steadily. In addition, it has a greenhouse potential 30 times higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, making it the second most important greenhouse gas after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Masson-Delmotte et al., 2023; Myhre et al., 2014). It is therefore particularly important to identify and monitor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks, which allows the cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be studied, as well as its contribution to global warming.  Sources and sinks can be identified by determining the stable isotopic ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the two stable isotopologues, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This ratio is referenced to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) standard and gives a distinct fingerprint of every source and sink of atmospheric methane. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for natural gas (the largest anthropogenic source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for natural sources such as wetlands (Schaefer et al., 2016; Quay et al., 1999).</p>
      <p id="d2e550">Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) is the established reference method for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determination and provides excellent precision (Brand, 1996). However, IRMS typically requires laboratory infrastructure, sample collection in flasks, and chemical pre-treatment of the sample prior to analysis, which prevents continuous in situ operation and limits the achievable temporal resolution at remote field sites. These limitations have motivated the development of optical absorption-based methods, which can be operated as compact field instruments and, in modern implementations, achieve precision approaching that of IRMS while offering high temporal resolution and continuous monitoring capability.</p>
      <p id="d2e566">A broad range of laser-based optical absorption techniques has been developed for trace gas and isotopic ratio analysis, differing primarily in their effective optical path length, the spectral region addressed, and the detection scheme. Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) in direct-absorption or wavelength-modulation configurations (Werle, 1998) represents the most straightforward implementation but is limited in sensitivity by the short single-pass interaction length. Multi-pass cells of Herriott or White type extend the optical path to several tens of meters and have been combined with both near-infrared diode lasers and mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers (QCLAS) to access the stronger fundamental absorption bands of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its isotopologues (McManus et al., 1995; McManus, 2010; Tuzson et al., 2008). Photoacoustic and quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS) (Patimisco et al., 2014) provide an alternative detection principle particularly suited to compact and miniaturized instrument designs. Cavity-based methods, in which the optical interaction length is enhanced by coupling light into a high-finesse optical cavity, achieve effective path lengths of several kilometers and enable trace gas detection at the parts-per-billion level or below. The most established variants are cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) (Crosson, 2008; Long et al., 2011; Zellweger et al., 2016; Dahnke et al., 2001), integrated cavity output spectroscopy (ICOS) and its off-axis variant (OA-ICOS) (Baer et al., 2002; O'Keefe, 1998), and cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (CEAS) in its various implementations.</p>
      <p id="d2e580">In this work, optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (OF-CEAS) is utilized, a CEAS variant in which a fraction of the resonant intracavity field is fed back into the laser source to act as injection seeding (Morville et al., 2002, 2005). OF-CEAS has been successfully demonstrated for high-precision trace gas and isotopologue measurements across the near- and mid-infrared using diode lasers (Kerstel et al., 2006; Habig et al., 2012), quantum cascade lasers (Bergin et al., 2013; Manfred et al., 2015), and interband cascade lasers (Lechevallier et al., 2019). The key mechanism is resonant optical feedback, coupling the laser source to a high-finesse optical cavity. A V-shaped cavity geometry is employed to provide controlled and stable optical feedback: the non-collinear configuration spatially separates the injected and reflected fields, thereby suppressing parasitic back reflections and enabling selective feedback of the cavity fundamental mode, which is essential for robust frequency locking. A portion of the intra-cavity field that is phase-coherent with the cavity modes is coupled back into the laser, thereby influencing the oscillation conditions of the laser medium. This feedback acts analogously to injection seeding, forcing the laser frequency to adapt to one of the cavity's longitudinal modes (Ohshima and Schnatz, 1992; Morville et al., 2002). Consequently, the laser becomes locked to the cavity modes during wavelength tuning. In addition to frequency stabilization, resonant feedback significantly suppresses phase and frequency noise, resulting in strong narrowing of the laser linewidth. Under favorable conditions, the effective laser linewidth can be smaller than the linewidth of the cavity modes. These effects ensure stable resonance matching between the laser and the cavity, forming the basis for the exceptional sensitivity and spectral resolution achievable with OF-CEAS (Morville et al., 2005). The resulting high spectral resolution and frequency stability are especially beneficial for stable isotopic ratio analysis, enabling accurate discrimination of weak isotopologue absorption lines in the presence of much stronger neighboring transitions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Line selection</title>
      <p id="d2e591">The strongest absorption band for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fundamental in the mid-infrared (MIR) region at around 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3333 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wavelength). Precise and selective measurements require the selection of absorption lines satisfying the following criteria. <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e648">The absorption lines of the stable isotopologues should lie within the laser's spectral tunability range so that the isotopic ratio can be determined in a single scan.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e652">Cross-sensitivities to interfering atmospheric species should be minimized.  This is achieved through the selection of a spectral window in which the targeted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines are not overlapped by strong transitions of atmospheric interferents and by applying reduced pressure, which narrows the absorption features through suppression of pressure broadening and provides clear spectral separation between otherwise overlapping lines.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e667">The selected absorption lines should have similar strengths to minimize the detector saturation at specific spectral frequency and optimize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).</p></list-item></list> The Q branch of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> band satisfies the first criterion. In this branch, strong <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines lie next to weaker <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines. However, the weaker <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines generally have a higher ground state energy than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines. According to Bergamaschi et al. (1994), this results in a higher temperature dependence of the isotopic ratio, given by

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lower</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with the energy difference between the ground state energies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lower</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the two relevant lines of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the absolute temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the Boltzmann constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e844">A spectral window satisfying all specified criteria was found by simulating the absorption spectrum using spectroscopic parameters from the HITRAN database (Gordon et al., 2022). For the simulation, an absorption path length of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">308.15</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were specified. The low-pressure condition was selected to minimize pressure broadening and thus achieve well-resolved, distinct absorption lines. The temperature was set to 308.15 K to ensure stable measurement conditions independent of ambient temperature fluctuations, as this value exceeds the expected ambient temperature range and allows thermal stabilization through heating alone, without the need for active cooling.  The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration corresponds to the ambient atmospheric concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To assess cross-sensitivities, all atmospheric species with known absorption features  in the simulation window were included at their  representative tropospheric background concentrations: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">427</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">332</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), carbon monoxide (CO) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Masson-Delmotte et al., 2023), and ethane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Helmig et al., 2016). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> such that its absorption is comparable in magnitude to the species of interest, for illustration purposes. The simulation results are shown in Fig. 1. The area between 3000.5 and 3001.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lies within the laser's tuning range and contains the two stable isotopologues, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the selected transitions corresponding to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Q(18) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Q(12) lines (Gordon et al., 2022; Bergamaschi et al., 1994).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1221">Simulated absorption spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relevant atmospheric interferents in the spectral window 3000.5–3001.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated using line parameters from the HITRAN database (Gordon et al., 2022) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">308.15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and an effective absorption path length of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the full absorption range with all simulated species. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows an enlarged view of the low-absorption region (zoom), revealing the spectral contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are not visible on the scale of <bold>(a)</bold>. Concentrations used in the simulation: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">427</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">332</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was set to 1000 ppm for illustration purposes, such that its absorption is comparable in magnitude to the species of interest.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1554">The central peak positions of these transitions are 3001.1926 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3000.7342 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with line strengths of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.108</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.513</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding ground state energies in HITRAN-units are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>lower</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1778.21</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>lower</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">814.68</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As mentioned above and to illustrate the resulting temperature influence, a further simulation was carried out with temperature changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a constant pressure of 40 mbar. The results are shown in Fig. 2, where Fig. 2a and b depict the temperature dependence of the selected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption lines, respectively. The simulations show that the response of the two isotopologues to temperature changes differs in magnitude and depends on the energy of the ground states of the corresponding transitions. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2a), temperature variations lead to a pronounced change in absorption strength, whereas for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2b) the corresponding variation is about a factor of 7 weaker within the investigated temperature range and therefore not readily apparent on the chosen scale. This difference arises from the lower ground-state energy of the selected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition. According to the Boltzmann distribution, populations of higher-energy ground states are more sensitive to temperature variations, resulting in stronger changes in absorption intensity. Using this information and the given values, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) can be used to determine the resulting uncertainty in the isotopic ratio for a temperature deviation. The isotopic ratio is expressed in the conventional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-notation relative to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) standard as

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M104" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>VPDB</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>VPDB</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0111105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dunn et al., 2024). Since the concentrations of both isotopologues are retrieved from temperature-dependent absorption line parameters, even small temperature deviations lead to unequal changes in the fitted line strengths and thus to systematic errors in the derived isotopic ratio. Applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) shows that, to achieve an uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the deviation of the gas temperature must be limited to 
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In comparison, pressure variations affect both isotopologues in a similar manner and therefore have no significant influence on the accuracy of the isotopic ratio determination. This behavior is illustrated in Fig. 2c and d for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, based on simulations carried out at constant temperature while varying the pressure around 40 mbar by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Nevertheless, pressure-induced changes in absorption strength and linewidth are clearly observable and reduce the achievable measurement precision. Although the gas temperature can in principle be measured and used for spectroscopic corrections, isotopic ratio retrieval is highly sensitive to small temporal temperature drifts and spatial temperature gradients along the optical path. These effects alter the line strengths and line shapes of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption features with different magnitudes due to their different temperature dependencies, leading to a systematic bias in the retrieved isotopic ratio that cannot be fully compensated for by the temperature readout alone. For this reason, active temperature stabilization of the gas cell is required to ensure reproducible isotopic ratio determination over extended measurement periods. The remaining weak absorption features in the investigated spectral window have no significant influence on the measurement due to their low line strengths and their spectral position relative to the targeted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transitions.  Nevertheless, residual spectral contributions from atmospheric trace gases, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are rigorously accounted for by incorporating all identified interferents into a multispecies HITRAN fit. The cross-sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be significantly reduced by drying the sample gas prior to analysis by, e.g., using a cold trap (Bergamaschi et al., 1994).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2204">Simulation of the influence of temperature and pressure variations on the selected absorption lines of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on HITRAN data. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold> show the temperature dependence of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines, respectively, for temperatures of 303.15, 308.15, and 313.15 K at a constant pressure of 40 mbar. The corresponding lower subpanels display the differential absorption <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the reference temperature of 308.15 K.  Panels <bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold> illustrate the effect of pressure variations (35, 40, and 45 mbar) at a constant temperature of 308.15 K, again with the lower subpanels showing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to 40 mbar. While pressure changes induce comparable variations for both isotopologues, temperature variations lead to significantly larger changes in absorption for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, reflecting their different lower-state energies and resulting in a higher temperature sensitivity of the isotopic ratio determination.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Experimental setup</title>
      <p id="d2e2345">The schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 3. An interband cascade laser (ICL) from Nanoplus GmbH with a central wavenumber of 2998.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (3335 nm wavelength) is used. The operating wavelength was selected based on prior spectroscopic simulations using the HITRAN database, following the line selection procedure described earlier. The laser current is controlled by QubeDL02-TD from ppqSense with a set point of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ICL</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the laser temperature is controlled by a LDC-3722 from ILX Lightwave at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ICL</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The laser is modulated via a ramp signal generated by a function generator (SDG 2122X, Siglent) with a ramp frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ramp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ramp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We use the LDC-3722 temperature controller at this ramp rate because it offers more stable operation in this range than the internal controller of the QubeDL02-TD. The laser beam is split via pellicle beam splitters (BP145B4, Thorlabs) (BS1 and BS2), leading to the cavity on one side and to the reference cell and a germanium (Ge) etalon on the other. The reference cell (wavelength references) is filled with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hermetically sealed at a pressure of approximately 40 mbar. The Ge-etalon (QMACS, neoplas control) is passively temperature stabilized by being mounted in thermally insulated housing, reducing short-term temperature fluctuations, and it has a length of 76.31 mm, resulting in a free spectral range (FSR) of 477.87 MHz (0.01594 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a refractive index of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this wavenumber region (Amotchkina et al., 2020). A Ge-etalon in combination with a reference gas cell is used to calibrate the wavenumber axis of the laser scan. The etalon provides evenly spaced transmission fringes, enabling correction of scan nonlinearities, while the reference cell supplies absolute frequency markers. This combined calibration yields an accurate and linear wavenumber scale across the entire scan range. Based on this calibrated axis, key cavity parameters such as the free spectral range, resonance linewidth, and finesse are determined.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2482">Schematic representation of the optical setup for the OF-CEAS. The beam (red) of an ICL is split into two paths. One path goes to a reference cell filled with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a Ge-etalon, which is used for wave number axis calibration. The other beam path leads to the cavity with mode matching, which uses a telescope setup (TM1 and TM2) and a matching lens (ML). The cavity is located inside housing made of Invar with temperature stabilization and a pressure sensor, as well as PT1000 temperature sensors for determining the gas temperature. The electronic schematic (blue) shows the photodetector signals' path with the signal of PD1 used to generate the error signal with the FPGA for active phase stabilization by adjusting the distance in the sub-micron range using a mirror and precisely controlling its position with a piezo stack (M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>PZT).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e2509">Data are recorded using a photodetector (PVI-4TE-3.4, Vigo Systems) for the cavity transmission and two for the transmission through the reference cell and the Ge etalon. The photodetector signals are digitized with a four-channel digitizer (M4i.4421-x8, Spectrum Instrumentation) with 16 bit resolution and a maximum sampling rate of 250 MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To ensure precise timing and phase coherence, a multi-clock board (Si5341-EB, Silicon Labs) is used to synchronize the digitizer, function generator, and all relevant electronic components. The design of the cavity and the parameters for mode matching, including the calculated beam waist and the relative positions of the telescope, mode-matching optics, and cavity, are derived from simulations based on Gaussian beam optics (Kogelnik and Li, 1966).</p>
      <p id="d2e2527">The cavity is basically a folded linear cavity forming a “V” shape with one planar mirror (CM1) and two concave mirrors (CM2 and CM3) with radii of curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a reflectivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.999893</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Layertec). The two cavity arms have a length of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">902.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> each with an angle of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in between.  The theoretically achievable effective absorption path length is 22.53 km with an FSR of 83.1 MHz. From the chosen design parameters, the corresponding cavity parameters were derived. The beam waist of 0.56 mm is located on mirror CM1, the beam radius on each of the two concave mirrors is 1.79 mm, and the Rayleigh length is 295.7 mm. In the beam path to the cavity, mode matching is performed using a telescope assembly consisting of two concave 0.5 in. mirrors with focal lengths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (TM1) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (TM2) mounted on clear-edge mirror mounts (KM05FL/M, Thorlabs). This enables compact design and reduces the angle of incidence to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which also minimizes astigmatism effect. The telescope adapts the beam diameter and, in combination with a mode-matching lens with a focal length of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ML), is positioned according to the calculated mode-matching parameters, with a distance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the telescope focus and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the cavity beam waist located at mirror CM1. A beam profiling camera (WinCamD-IR-BB, DataRay) was used to adjust and optimize the beam profile for mode matching.  For OF-CEAS, the V-shaped cavity offers the advantage that the deflected beam path effectively suppresses unwanted parasitic feedback from direct mirror reflections, which could otherwise destabilize the coupling. This means that only the portion of light that circulates resonantly in the cavity and exits via the mirrors is coupled back into the laser. Injection seeding is thus achieved while maintaining the phase condition (Morville et al., 2005). The phase of the returning beam must match that of the beam emerging from the laser. The phase condition can be fulfilled by adjusting the distance between the laser and the cavity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which has to be met throughout the entire scanning process of the laser. The optimal phase for all longitudinal modes is achieved when the distance is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Whether <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is an even or odd number has an effect on the spectral resolution. With an odd number, every longitudinal mode has the optimal phase, while with an even number, this only applies to every second longitudinal mode. To keep the design compact, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was set to 1 in this work, resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">902</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The optical components were placed accordingly and the ICL was mounted on a translation stage (XR50C/M, Thorlabs) for rough adjustment of the distance. To adjust the distance in the sub-micron range and actively stabilize the phase, the mirror positions are precisely controlled by a piezo stack. Deviations from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result in a transmission signal with a beating pattern consisting of mode groups of varying intensities, whose period increases as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approached until it finally reaches infinity at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Upon closer inspection of individual modes, an asymmetry of the modes is observed, and symmetry is only achieved when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">902</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This influence on the symmetry of the modes is used to generate an error signal with a FPGA (STEMlab 125-14, Red Pitaya), which is used to move the mirror on the piezo stack. For this purpose, the transmission signal of the cavity is detected, and the detector signal is split in two branches via a power splitter (ZFRSC-183-S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mini-Circuits). The detector signal is recorded with the digitizer and, additionally, it is fed into the FPGA for real-time error signal generation. The FPGA runs a Python script, which derives the signal in real time and generates the error signal by determining the amplitudes of the maxima and minima of the first derivative and calculating their sum. In the case of symmetry, the sum is zero; in the case of asymmetry, the sum is nonzero with a positive or negative sign, depending on the direction of the shift in the mode maxima. This results in the error signal, whose sign indicates the direction in which the phase must be adjusted (Habig et al., 2012). Finally, the error signal is forwarded to a piezo controller (MDT693B, Thorlabs) to control the piezo stack's displacement.</p>
      <p id="d2e2858">The cavity is located inside a specially designed Invar cell containing cylindrical bores with a diameter of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that merge at one end, thereby defining a V-shaped cavity geometry (Fig. 4). The cell is equipped with gas connections, a pressure sensor (PAA-33X, Keller), and three Pt1000 temperature sensors, one at each end of the cell, allowing the temperature distribution along the full cavity length to be monitored. The internal volume of the gas cell is approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.894</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.036</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Twelve electronic heating elements with implemented PID control were designed and installed on the sides of the cell to stabilize the temperature to 308.15 K. In addition, the cell was thermally insulated with 10 mm thick expanded polystyrene (EPS). The cavity mirrors are mounted inside vacuum-compatible end caps that integrate both the mirror holders and wedged optical windows. The end caps allow precise cavity alignment and subsequently provide a gas-tight seal of the cell using FKM O-rings.  Internal gas channels within the end caps ensure complete flushing of the entire cell volume. For optical alignment, temporary pinholes can be inserted at designated positions at the window sides and on the top of the cell, which are replaced by sealing plugs after alignment. The windows are wedged and made of sapphire with anti-reflection coatings (WW31050-E1, Thorlabs). The mirror mounts for the highly reflective cavity mirrors (Polaris series K1S5, Thorlabs) are specially designed for vacuum applications and are integrated into custom-designed end caps. This design enables precise cavity alignment followed by gas-tight sealing of the cell using FKM O-rings, while integrated gas ports and internal gas routing within the end caps ensure complete flushing of the entire cell volume. The reduced pressure in the cell with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is achieved using a vacuum pump system (NG920G pump and the associated VC900 controller, KNF).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2921"><bold>(a)</bold> Invar cell housing the V-shaped cavity, equipped with six heating plates on each side, gas connections, a pressure sensor, and three Pt1000 temperature sensors mounted at each end of the cell. The design further allows the temporary insertion of pinholes for cavity alignment, which are subsequently replaced by sealing plugs. <bold>(b)</bold> Cross-sectional view of the cell illustrating the optical beam path through two boreholes that merge at one end. The borehole diameter is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The individual cavity arm lengths – defined as the mirror-to-mirror distances – are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">902.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are separated by an angle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c)</bold> Detailed view of one end cap integrating the wedged window and the mirror mount holding the cavity mirror. The design enables precise cavity alignment followed by a gas-tight sealing of the cell using FKM O-rings. The gas port and internal gas routing within the end caps ensure complete flushing of the cell volume with a value of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.894</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.036</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e3031">As already described, temperature is a critical parameter to precisely determine the stable isotopic ratio of atmospheric methane that should be precisely controlled. Therefore, the cell was designed in such a way that it is possible to regulate and precisely determine the cell temperature while ensuring long-term stability of the cavity's temperature. To minimize thermally induced dimensional changes, Invar was selected as the cavity material. Invar exhibits an exceptionally low coefficient of thermal expansion, resulting in only negligible deformation under temperature variations. This is particularly advantageous in optical assemblies, as the alignment of sensitive components, such as the cavity mirrors, remains stable even under mild fluctuations in the ambient temperature. Consequently, positional drift and optical misalignment are effectively suppressed. In addition to thermal stability, the pressure stability inside the cavity is important since the isotope ratio is measured under reduced pressure. The assembled cell was therefore subjected to a leak test and was found to have a leak rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This ensures negligible pressure drift, especially since the effect of a pressure change has a comparable effect on both isotopologues. Active thermal stabilization is implemented using heating boards regulated by PID controllers. Six heating modules are symmetrically mounted on each side of the cell to ensure uniform temperature distribution. Feedback for the control loop is provided by embedded thermistors (NTC, negative temperature coefficient) in the cell material. The 12 NTC sensors were all calibrated precisely under the same conditions. Following integration of the heating boards onto the cell, the PID parameters were tuned. For this purpose, each heating board was actuated individually first and subsequently all boards were driven collectively to verify stable and coordinated thermal control.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3074">Long-term temperature stability at a set point of 308.15 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Mean of the 12 NTC sensors with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> band over 19 h, showing no detectable drift. <bold>(b)</bold> Allan deviation indicating white noise behavior at short <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a long-term floor of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> set by slow environmental perturbations.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3126">An over 19 h long-term stability measurement of the actively controlled heater assembly regulated to 308.15 K was carried out and is presented in Fig. 5. Figure 5a shows the mean temperature of all 12 NTC sensors together with the single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> envelope. No systematic drift is observed on the timescale of the measurement and the ensemble remains confined within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> band, indicating stable loop performance and uniform thermal distribution across the cell. Figure 5b shows the Allan deviation of the mean temperature (Allan, 1966; Werle et al., 1993). For short averaging times (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the data follow a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dependence, consistent with a white-noise-dominated regime set by sensor and readout noise. At intermediate times (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a shallow peak emerges, indicating that in this band the residual error is dominated by correlated loop-internal effects, such as finite PID gain, quantization in the heater actuation, and partially correlated sensor offsets. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Allan deviation decreases again, demonstrating continued temporal averaging after the internal loop correlation time. For the longer averaging times (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the Allan deviation approaches a floor on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with very low frequency perturbations outside the control bandwidth, such as slow ambient thermal cycles, conductive coupling through the table, or long-term equilibration processes within the assembly. The measurements demonstrate drift-free temperature control for periods of tens of hours, as well as long-term stability on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.557</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The residual limit is not set by the loop itself but rather by slow perturbations outside its bandwidth. The system maintains 10 mK stability over long durations and achieves averaged instability below 10 µK, sufficient for high-precision isotopic-ratio measurements. In combination with a stable gas temperature, measured by the Pt1000 sensors, an isotopic ratio precision of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expected. For the spectral analysis, the cell was first flushed with nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) after which compressed air from the building supply line was introduced, which complies with clean room standards and is therefore dried ambient air. The pressure in the cell was stabilized at 40 mbar. A 1000 s measurement of the gas absorption was performed. Figure 6 shows the temperature recorded by the three Pt1000 sensors mounted at different positions in the cell measuring the gas temperature. The traces depict a static offset of around 1 K with respect to the set point of 308.15 K and deviations between the sensor measurements of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These differences are consistent with the thermal geometry and gas flow conditions. PT1 is positioned near the gas outlet on the narrow side of the cell, whereas PT2 and PT3 are located on the wider face, close to the gas inlet. Therefore, the observed deviations reflect spatial gradients and flow-dependent heat transport within the gas volume rather than any instability of the controlled Invar body. Due to the temperature distribution within the cell, the temperature is averaged across all three sensors, as presented in Fig. 7. The average temperature data and the corresponding Allan deviation (Fig. 7b) reflect the performance of the heating control loop itself. Therefore, the observed behavior characterizes the control dynamics of the Invar cell rather than local temperature fluctuations in the gas phase.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3373">Temperature measurement data from the three Pt1000 sensors over a period of 1000 s. The sensors are integrated into the respective ends of the cell and measure the gas temperature. There is a deviation of approximately 1 K from the set point of 308.15 K and a deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the sensors.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3398">Average over the three Pt1000 sensors over a period of 1000 s. <bold>(a)</bold> Mean Pt1000 temperature showing a static offset and spatial gradient caused by geometry and gas flow but no temporal drift on this timescale. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> refers to a decreasing Allan deviation at short <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and low-frequency environmental contributions at long <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3429">Measurement of the cavity transmission signal. <bold>(a)</bold> The entire spectrum including the absorption lines of the isotopologues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines, reproducing the simulation in the line selection. <bold>(b)</bold> Enlarged area marked in red. The modes of the cavity transmission, their symmetry, and representations of the FWHM and the FSR of five modes can be seen.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3487">The data of the mean value show that the closed-loop control system maintains a stable operating point with no measurable drift. Therefore, the residual fluctuations in the mean and the Allan deviation are not due to instability in the thermal regulation but originate from external disturbances outside the control bandwidth (e.g., slow ambient coupling, gas flow-induced gradients, and conductive exchange through the mounting on the table). Based on the Allan deviation and the optimum integration time of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the transmission spectrum of the cavity was accordingly averaged and is shown in Fig. 8. Figure 8a shows the measured transmission signal, which reproduces the simulated absorption structure obtained in the line selection. For mode-resolved analysis, the red-marked region is enlarged in the lower panel. The expected symmetry of the cavity modes is clearly visible, achieved by active locking via the algorithm running on the FPGA. The relative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis was calibrated against the FSR of the Ge-etalon in order to extract the FSR and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the individual modes. Mode-by-mode evaluation yields averages over 344 modes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FWHM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FSR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are in good agreement with the theoretical FSR of 83.1 MHz. The measurement uncertainties can be attributed to the lock-in control, in which slight deviations result in a shift in the maxima and a narrowing of the mode, leading to inaccuracies in the detection of the points for determining the FWHM and FSR by the algorithm. However, the relevant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption lines exhibit a typical FWHM of approximately 358 MHz, resulting in about four sampling points per absorption FWHM for the measured FSR of 84 MHz. This fulfills the Nyquist sampling condition and permits robust model-based fitting using a Voigt profile with spectroscopic parameters from the HITRAN database, which is presented in Fig. 9 (Nyquist, 1928; Shannon, 1949). A noise-equivalent absorbance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NEA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reference measurement for an integration time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ramp frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ramp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The noise-equivalent absorbance was determined from the nitrogen reference measurement by converting the baseline-corrected transmission signal peaks of individual cavity modes to absorbance using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and calculating the standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Given the expected effective absorption path length of 22.53 km, the corresponding equivalent noise absorption coefficient is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the measured noise level is dominated by mode-dependent residual structures attributed to etalon interference across the cavity modes. The single-shot NEA values of the individual ramps range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared to the single-shot NEA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Lechevallier et al. (2019), the present single-shot NEA is about 1 order of magnitude higher, indicating that the sensitivity is currently limited by residual structures rather than by fundamental noise sources and thus leaves room for further optimization. The corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limits (LOD) for the isotopologues were derived from NE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using HITRAN-based Voigt simulations at the measurement conditions, yielding 0.19 ppm for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3.3 ppb for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both detection limits lie about 1 order of magnitude below the atmospheric background mole fractions of 1.9 ppm for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 21 ppb for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to factors of 10 and 6.4 above the respective LOD. This margin provides a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio for the simultaneous detection of both isotopologues at ambient concentrations and thus enables the determination of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature targeted in this work. Figure 9 shows the cavity transmission together with a fit based on a Voigt profile physical model applied to the cavity transmission mode peaks, including spectroscopic parameters from the HITRAN database.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e3881">Measured cavity transmission spectrum <bold>(a)</bold> and baseline-corrected transmission <bold>(b)</bold> and the corresponding fit. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption with a fitted concentration of 8132 ppm influences the spectrum and overlaps the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> feature, resulting in an fitted total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of just 1.365 ppm, leading to a relative error of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the expected value of 1.9 ppm. Residual misalignment of the low-wavenumber region is consistent with imperfect wavenumber calibration.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3949">The cavity transmission signal shown in Fig. 9a corresponds to the raw output of the photodetector recorded by the digitizer. Consequently, a constant offset of the detector signal of approximately 2000 a.u. is visible, which originates from the photodetector preamplifier and is present even in the absence of an optical signal. This electronic offset shifts the baseline to a non-zero value but is explicitly accounted for and corrected within the fitting procedure.  The measured mean temperature and pressure  during the acquisition were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">306.928</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.798</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e4002">Although the gas cell was connected to the laboratory dry-air line, the retrieved spectrum indicates a fitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of approximately 8132 ppm. This residual water vapor is attributed not to the gas sources themselves but most likely can be traced back to humidity present in the in-house gas distribution system or to moisture ingress through gas lines and fittings, which could not be fully excluded under the experimental conditions. The strong <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption features dominate the investigated spectral region, distort the baseline, and partially overlap the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption line. As a result, the global fit across the full spectral range underestimates the methane concentration, yielding a value of 1.365 ppm compared to the expected ambient concentration of approximately 1.9 ppm. This corresponds to a relative deviation of about 28 % and arises from spectral interference and baseline distortion caused by water vapor. This directly affects isotopic analysis, as it becomes difficult to determine the isotopologues' concentrations and thus the isotopic ratio from the line profiles when water covers the spectrum. Once the dominant isotopologue is suppressed and the baseline is modulated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the isotopic ratio becomes systematically biased and cannot be reliably interpreted. In addition, the visible mismatch on the low-wavenumber side of the spectrum is consistent with remaining limitations in the wavenumber calibration, which further constrain the accuracy of the global fit. The effective absorption path length was included as a free parameter in the global fitting procedure and was determined from the optimized fit parameters to be 22.535 km. Given additional loss mechanisms such as residual misalignment, non-ideal mirror reflectivity, and intracavity absorption, this value is expected to represent an upper estimate, and a reduced effective path length is anticipated under more realistic conditions. A more detailed experimental validation of the effective absorption path length is therefore deferred to future work. To further investigate the origin of the methane concentration deviation, a refined fitting approach was applied to a reduced spectral interval between 3001.10 and 3001.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which contains the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption line and is not affected by the low-wavenumber calibration mismatch. In this restricted window the baseline distortion is reduced while only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are included in the fit model. The result of this targeted fit is shown in Fig. 10. The retrieved methane concentration is 1.87 ppm, while the fitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is 10 933 ppm. The effective absorption path length was included as a free parameter in the fitting procedure and was determined to be 12.6 km, which is considered more realistic under the present experimental conditions. With this refined analysis, the relative deviation of the methane concentration is reduced to approximately 1.6 %. The residuals of the refined fit shown in Fig. 10b exhibit no pronounced systematic structures and fluctuate symmetrically around zero. This behavior represents a clear improvement compared to the global fit across the full spectral range and confirms that the dominant source of error in the initial analysis originates from water-induced spectral overlap and baseline distortion rather than from deficiencies in the line-shape model or the cavity transmission data.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4132">Fit of the cavity transmission in a reduced spectral interval between 3001.10 and 3001.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, focused on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption line. <bold>(a)</bold> Baseline-corrected transmission mode peaks together with a Voigt-profile-based fit. The individual contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed blue line) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed orange line) are shown separately. By restricting the fit window to this interval, spectral regions affected by strong baseline distortion and wavenumber calibration mismatch are excluded. <bold>(b)</bold> Residuals (data minus fit) of the refined fit, demonstrating a substantial reduction in systematic structures compared to the global fit and indicating that the remaining deviations are dominated by statistical noise. The refined analysis yields a methane concentration of 1.87 ppm and an effective absorption path length of 12.6 km.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/15/141/2026/jsss-15-141-2026-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4205">The improved residual structure supports the robustness of the refined fitting approach and confirms a methane concentration of 1.87 ppm in agreement with the expected ambient value. These results demonstrate that, once spectral interference is sufficiently mitigated, the OF-CEAS system is capable of quantitatively accurate methane retrieval.</p>
      <p id="d2e4209">In conclusion, the present data demonstrate that residual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interference, rather than the cavity design or the OF-CEAS detection principle itself, currently limits spectroscopic accuracy. The observed baseline distortions and partial spectral overlap induced by water vapor directly affect quantitative methane retrieval and prevent an unbiased determination of isotopic ratios under the present experimental conditions.  The present measurements should therefore be regarded as a proof-of-principle demonstration of the spectroscopic performance of the OF-CEAS system, rather than providing fully quantitative isotopic results.  Achieving quantitative accuracy and reliable isotopic ratio determination will require further optimization of the experimental conditions. In particular, improved gas handling with verified leak-tight operation and active gas drying is essential to suppress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced spectral overlap. In addition, calibration measurements using certified methane gas mixtures and the experimental determination of the effective absorption path length are necessary to fully characterize the system performance and are explicitly planned for future work. Once these measures are implemented under fully optimized gas handling conditions, the system is expected to permit accurate and reproducible methane concentration measurements and unbiased isotopic ratio analysis in this spectral window.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e4247">In this work, we present the design, implementation, and characterization of an OF-CEAS system for isotopic analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the MIR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> band around 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Q(18) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Q(12) transitions can be probed within a single laser scan. The high-finesse V-shaped cavity (theoretical effective path length of 22.53 km,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FSR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is integrated into an Invar cell with a measured leak rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is actively temperature-stabilized at 308.15 K via 12 PID-controlled heating boards. The thermal architecture meets the precision targets imposed by stable isotopic ratio analysis. Allan deviation analysis yields a long-term cell-temperature stability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a gas temperature stability, measured by embedded Pt1000 sensors, of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both values lie well below the 6.8 mK gas temperature budget required for an isotopic ratio uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the ground state energy difference in the selected lines, confirming that thermal noise does not limit isotopic precision in this configuration.</p>
      <p id="d2e4462">Active FPGA-based phase locking yields cavity transmission spectra with the symmetric mode structure expected from successful optical feedback.  Mode-by-mode evaluation over 344 modes gives <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FWHM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>FSR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in good agreement with the theoretical FSR of 83.1 MHz, and provides approximately four sampling points per absorption FWHM, satisfying the Nyquist condition for Voigt profile retrieval. From the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  reference measurement, a noise-equivalent absorbance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NEA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained, corresponding to a noise-equivalent absorption coefficient of 
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the theoretical effective path length. The corresponding 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limits of 0.19 ppm for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3.3 ppb for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lie about 1 order of magnitude below the atmospheric background mole fractions of 1.9 ppm and 21 ppb, demonstrating that the system is in principle sensitive enough to detect ambient methane and to access the stable isotopic ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4656">Cross-sensitivity to water vapor was identified as the dominant systematic effect under the present gas conditions. Despite operation on the laboratory dry-air line, the retrieved spectrum contains a residual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content of approximately 8132 ppm, which influences the spectral baseline and partially overlaps the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> feature. A global fit across the full investigated range therefore systematically underestimates the methane concentration at 1.365 ppm against an expected ambient value of 1.9 ppm, corresponding to a relative deviation of about 28 %, and precludes an unbiased determination of the isotopic ratio. A refined fit restricted to a narrower window centered on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line, with only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> included in the model, recovers a methane concentration of 1.87 ppm, a residual deviation of approximately 1.6 % and residuals that fluctuate symmetrically around zero without a pronounced systematic structure. This localizes the limitation to the gas state during the measurement rather than to the optical design, cavity performance, or detection chain of the OF-CEAS system and shows that, once the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overlap is excluded from the analysis, the instrument delivers quantitatively accurate methane concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d2e4744">Future work will accordingly focus on the gas-handling chain, in particular verified leak-tight operation and active drying, to suppress water-induced cross-sensitivity at the source rather than only in post-processing.  Calibration measurements with certified methane gas mixtures and an experimental determination of the effective absorption path length are planned to complete the quantitative characterization of the spectrometer.  In the longer term, the integration of the optical bench, the gas handling, and the control electronics into a transportable enclosure is envisioned, motivated by the in situ application targets that originally distinguish optical absorption methods from IRMS-based laboratory analysis. Combined with the demonstrated thermal stability, spectral fidelity, and calibration chain, these steps are expected to enable unbiased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio determination at the targeted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precision in this spectral window.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4783">The underlying software code is not publicly available and can be requested from the authors if required.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4789">The underlying measurement data are not publicly available and can be requested from the authors if required.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4795">CD designed and built the spectrometer, carried out the experiments, performed the data visualization, and wrote the original manuscript. The experiments were planned by CD, PN, JG, and LN. CW designed the temperature control electronics. KS and JW supervised the work. The text was revised by all contributing authors and all authors approved of the final article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4801">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4807">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4813">The authors thank Ulrich Ulmer for the design of the Invar cell and Nicolas Brugger for his support.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4818">This work was supported by the Georg H. Endress Stiftung, whose financial contribution is gratefully acknowledged.This open-access publication was funded by the University of Freiburg.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4829">This paper was edited by Michael Kraft and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Allan, D. W.: Statistics of atomic frequency standards, Proc. IEEE, 54, 221–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1966.4634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/PROC.1966.4634</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Amotchkina, T., Trubetskov, M., Hahner, D., and Pervak, V.: Characterization of e-beam evaporated Ge, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">YbF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ZnS, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LaF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thin films for laser-oriented coatings, Appl. Optics, 59, A40–A47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.59.000A40" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.59.000A40</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Baer, D. S., Paul, J. B., Gupta, M., and O'Keefe, A.: Sensitive absorption measurements in the near-infrared region using off-axis integrated-cavity-output spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. B, 75, 261–265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-002-0971-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-002-0971-z</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bergamaschi, P., Schupp, M., and Harris, G. W.: High-precision direct measurements of (13)CH(4)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(12)CH(4) and (12)CH(3)D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(12)CH(4) ratios in atmospheric methane sources by means of a long-path tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer, Appl. Optics, 33, 7704–7716, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.007704" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.33.007704</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bergin, A. G. V., Hancock, G., Ritchie, G. A. D., and Weidmann, D.: Linear cavity optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a quantum cascade laser, Opt. Lett., 38, 2475–2477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.002475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/OL.38.002475</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Brand, W. A.: High Precision Isotope Ratio Monitoring Techniques in Mass Spectrometry, J. Mass Spectrom., 31, 225–235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199603)31:3&lt;225::AID-JMS319&gt;3.0.CO;2-L" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199603)31:3&lt;225::AID-JMS319&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Crosson, E. R.: A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor, Appl. Phys. B, 92, 403–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Dahnke, H., Kleine, D., Urban, W., Hering, P., and Mürtz, M.: Isotopic ratio measurement of methane in ambient air using mid-infrared cavity leak-out spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. B, 72, 121–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400000509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s003400000509</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Dunn, P. J. H., Malinovsky, D., Ogrinc, N., Potočnik, D., Flierl, L., Rienitz, O., Paul, D., and Meijer, H. A. J.: Re-determination of R(13C/12C) for Vienna Peedee belemnite (VPDB), Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 38, e9773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9773" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.9773</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, R. J., Hashemi, R., Karlovets, E. V., Skinner, F. M., Conway, E. K., Hill, C., Kochanov, R. V., Tan, Y., Wcisło, P., Finenko, A. A., Nelson, K., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K. V., Coustenis, A., Drouin, B. J., Flaud, J.-M., Gamache, R. R., Hodges, J. T., Jacquemart, D., Mlawer, E. J., Nikitin, A. V., Perevalov, V. I., Rotger, M., Tennyson, J., Toon, G. C., Tran, H., Tyuterev, V. G., Adkins, E. M., Baker, A., Barbe, A., Canè, E., Császár, A. G., Dudaryonok, A., Egorov, O., Fleisher, A. J., Fleurbaey, H., Foltynowicz, A., Furtenbacher, T., Harrison, J. J., Hartmann, J.-M., Horneman, V.-M., Huang, X., Karman, T., Karns, J., Kassi, S., Kleiner, I., Kofman, V., Kwabia–Tchana, F., Lavrentieva, N. N., Lee, T. J., Long, D. A., Lukashevskaya, A. A., Lyulin, O. M., Makhnev, V., Matt, W., Massie, S. T., Melosso, M., Mikhailenko, S. N., Mondelain, D., Müller, H., Naumenko, O. V., Perrin, A., Polyansky, O. L., Raddaoui, E., Raston, P. L., Reed, Z. D., Rey, M., Richard, C., Tóbiás, R., Sadiek, I., Schwenke, D. W., Starikova, E., Sung, K., Tamassia, F., Tashkun, S. A., Vander Auwera, J., Vasilenko, I. A., Vigasin, A. A., Villanueva, G. L., Vispoel, B., Wagner, G., Yachmenev, A., and Yurchenko, S. N.: The HITRAN2020 molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 277, 107949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Habig, J. C., Nadolny, J., Meinen, J., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: Optical feedback cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy: effective adjustment of the feedback-phase, Appl. Phys. B, 106, 491–499, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4804-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-011-4804-9</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Helmig, D., Rossabi, S., Hueber, J., Tans, P., Montzka, S. A., Masarie, K., Thoning, K., Plass-Duelmer, C., Claude, A., Carpenter, L. J., Lewis, A. C., Punjabi, S., Reimann, S., Vollmer, M. K., Steinbrecher, R., Hannigan, J. W., Emmons, L. K., Mahieu, E., Franco, B., Smale, D., and Pozzer, A.: Reversal of global atmospheric ethane and propane trends largely due to US oil and natural gas production, Nat. Geosci., 9, 490–495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2721</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Kerstel, E., Iannone, R. Q., Chenevier, M., Kassi, S., Jost, H.-J., and Romanini, D.: A water isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) spectrometer based on optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption for in situ airborne applications, Appl. Phys. B, 85, 397–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2356-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-006-2356-1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kogelnik, H. and Li, T.: Laser beams and resonators, Appl. Optics, 5, 1550–1567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.5.001550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.5.001550</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Lechevallier, L., Grilli, R., Kerstel, E., Romanini, D., and Chappellaz, J.: Simultaneous detection of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in the mid-infrared region: towards application for dissolved gas measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3101–3109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3101-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-3101-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Long, D. A., Okumura, M., Miller, C. E., and Hodges, J. T.: Frequency-stabilized cavity ring-down spectroscopy measurements of carbon dioxide isotopic ratios, Appl. Phys. B, 105, 471–477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4518-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-011-4518-z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Manfred, K. M., Ciaffoni, L., and Ritchie, G. A. D.: Optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in a linear cavity: model and experiments, Appl. Phys. B, 120, 329–339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-015-6140-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-015-6140-y</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Masson-Delmotte, V.  P., Zhai, A., Pirani, S. L., Connors, C., Péan, S., Berger, N., Caud, Y., Chen, L., Goldfarb, M. I., Gomis, M., Huang, K., Leitzell, E., and Lonnoy, J.: IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>McManus, J. B., Kebabian, P. L., and Zahniser, M. S.: Astigmatic mirror multipass absorption cells for long-path-length spectroscopy, Appl. Optics, 34, 3336–3348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.003336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.34.003336</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>McManus, J. B.: Application of quantum cascade lasers to high-precision atmospheric trace gas measurements, Opt. Eng., 49, 111124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3498782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/1.3498782</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Morville, J., Kassi, S., Chenevier, M., and Romanini, D.: Fast, low-noise, mode-by-mode, cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy by diode-laser self-locking, Appl. Phys. B, 80, 1027–1038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-005-1828-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-005-1828-z</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Morville, J., Romanini, D., Chenevier, M., and Kachanov, A.: Effects of laser phase noise on the injection of a high-finesse cavity, Appl. Optics, 41, 6980–6990, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.006980" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.41.006980</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G. D., Shindell, F.-M., Bréon, W., Collins, J., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, D., Koch, J.-F., Lamarque, D., Lee, B., Mendoza, T., Nakajima, A., Robock, G., Stephens, T., Takemura, T. and Zhang, H.: An thropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.,  Cambridge University Press, 659–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Nyquist, H.: Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory, Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng., 47, 617–644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AIEE.1928.5055024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/T-AIEE.1928.5055024</ext-link>, 1928.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ohshima, S. and Schnatz, H.: Optimization of injection current and feedback phase of an optically self-locked laser diode, J. Appl. Phys., 71, 3114–3117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.351006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.351006</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>O'Keefe, A.: Integrated cavity output analysis of ultra-weak absorption, Chem. Phys. Lett., 293, 331–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00785-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00785-4</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Patimisco, P., Scamarcio, G., Tittel, F. K., and Spagnolo, V.: Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy: a review, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 14, 6165–6206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s140406165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/s140406165</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Quay, P., Stutsman, J., Wilbur, D., Snover, A., Dlugokencky, E., and Brown, T.: The isotopic composition of atmospheric methane, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 445–461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GB900006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998GB900006</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Schaefer, H., Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Veidt, C., Lassey, K. R., Brailsford, G. W., Bromley, T. M., Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., Levin, I., Lowe, D. C., Martin, R. J., Vaughn, B. H., and White, J. W. C.: A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Science (New York, NY), 352, 80–84, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aad2705</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Shannon, C. E.: Communication in the Presence of Noise, P. IRE, 37, 10–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969</ext-link>, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Tuzson, B., Mohn, J., Zeeman, M. J., Werner, R. A., Eugster, W., Zahniser, M. S., Nelson, D. D., McManus, J. B., and Emmenegger, L.: High precision and continuous field measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in carbon dioxide with a cryogen-free QCLAS, Appl. Phys. B, 92, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3085-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-008-3085-4</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Werle, P., Mcke, R., and Slemr, F.: The limits of signal averaging in atmospheric trace-gas monitoring by tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), Appl. Phys. B, 57, 131–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425997" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00425997</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Werle, P.: A review of recent advances in semiconductor laser based gas monitors, Spectrochim. Acta A, 54, 197–236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(97)00227-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1386-1425(97)00227-8</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Zellweger, C., Emmenegger, L., Firdaus, M., Hatakka, J., Heimann, M., Kozlova, E., Spain, T. G., Steinbacher, M., van der Schoot, M. V., and Buchmann, B.: Assessment of recent advances in measurement techniques for atmospheric carbon dioxide and methane observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4737–4757, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4737-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4737-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Development and optimization of an OF-CEAS system  for stable isotopic ratio analysis of   methane (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub>) in the mid-infrared</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Allan, D. W.: Statistics of atomic frequency standards, Proc. IEEE, 54, 221–230,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1966.4634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1966.4634</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Amotchkina, T., Trubetskov, M., Hahner, D., and Pervak, V.: Characterization of e-beam evaporated Ge,
YbF<sub>3</sub>, ZnS, and LaF<sub>3</sub> thin films for laser-oriented coatings, Appl. Optics, 59, A40–A47,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.59.000A40" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.59.000A40</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Baer, D. S., Paul, J. B., Gupta, M., and O'Keefe, A.: Sensitive absorption measurements in the near-infrared
region using off-axis integrated-cavity-output spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. B, 75, 261–265,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-002-0971-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-002-0971-z</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Bergamaschi, P., Schupp, M., and Harris, G. W.: High-precision direct measurements of (13)CH(4)∕(12)CH(4)
and (12)CH(3)D∕(12)CH(4) ratios in atmospheric methane sources by means of a long-path tunable diode laser
absorption spectrometer, Appl. Optics, 33, 7704–7716, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.007704" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.007704</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Bergin, A. G. V., Hancock, G., Ritchie, G. A. D., and Weidmann, D.: Linear cavity optical-feedback
cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a quantum cascade laser, Opt. Lett., 38, 2475–2477,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.002475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.002475</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Brand, W. A.: High Precision Isotope Ratio Monitoring Techniques in Mass Spectrometry, J. Mass Spectrom.,
31, 225–235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199603)31:3&lt;225::AID-JMS319&gt;3.0.CO;2-L" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199603)31:3&lt;225::AID-JMS319&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Crosson, E. R.: A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide, and
water vapor, Appl. Phys. B, 92, 403–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Dahnke, H., Kleine, D., Urban, W., Hering, P., and Mürtz, M.: Isotopic ratio measurement of methane in
ambient air using mid-infrared cavity leak-out spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. B, 72, 121–125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400000509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400000509</a>,
2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Dunn, P. J. H., Malinovsky, D., Ogrinc, N., Potočnik, D., Flierl, L., Rienitz, O., Paul, D., and
Meijer, H. A. J.: Re-determination of R(13C/12C) for Vienna Peedee belemnite (VPDB), Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 38,
e9773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9773" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9773</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, R. J., Hashemi, R., Karlovets, E. V., Skinner, F. M.,
Conway, E. K., Hill, C., Kochanov, R. V., Tan, Y., Wcisło, P., Finenko, A. A., Nelson, K., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M.,
Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K. V., Coustenis, A., Drouin, B. J., Flaud, J.-M., Gamache, R. R., Hodges, J. T.,
Jacquemart, D., Mlawer, E. J., Nikitin, A. V., Perevalov, V. I., Rotger, M., Tennyson, J., Toon, G. C., Tran, H.,
Tyuterev, V. G., Adkins, E. M., Baker, A., Barbe, A., Canè, E., Császár, A. G., Dudaryonok, A.,
Egorov, O., Fleisher, A. J., Fleurbaey, H., Foltynowicz, A., Furtenbacher, T., Harrison, J. J., Hartmann, J.-M.,
Horneman, V.-M., Huang, X., Karman, T., Karns, J., Kassi, S., Kleiner, I., Kofman, V., Kwabia–Tchana, F.,
Lavrentieva, N. N., Lee, T. J., Long, D. A., Lukashevskaya, A. A., Lyulin, O. M., Makhnev, V., Matt, W.,
Massie, S. T., Melosso, M., Mikhailenko, S. N., Mondelain, D., Müller, H., Naumenko, O. V., Perrin, A.,
Polyansky, O. L., Raddaoui, E., Raston, P. L., Reed, Z. D., Rey, M., Richard, C., Tóbiás, R., Sadiek, I.,
Schwenke, D. W., Starikova, E., Sung, K., Tamassia, F., Tashkun, S. A., Vander Auwera, J., Vasilenko, I. A.,
Vigasin, A. A., Villanueva, G. L., Vispoel, B., Wagner, G., Yachmenev, A., and Yurchenko, S. N.: The HITRAN2020
molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 277, 107949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Habig, J. C., Nadolny, J., Meinen, J., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: Optical feedback cavity enhanced
absorption spectroscopy: effective adjustment of the feedback-phase, Appl. Phys. B, 106, 491–499,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4804-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4804-9</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Helmig, D., Rossabi, S., Hueber, J., Tans, P., Montzka, S. A., Masarie, K., Thoning, K., Plass-Duelmer, C.,
Claude, A., Carpenter, L. J., Lewis, A. C., Punjabi, S., Reimann, S., Vollmer, M. K., Steinbrecher, R.,
Hannigan, J. W., Emmons, L. K., Mahieu, E., Franco, B., Smale, D., and Pozzer, A.: Reversal of global atmospheric
ethane and propane trends largely due to US oil and natural gas production, Nat. Geosci., 9, 490–495,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2721</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Kerstel, E., Iannone, R. Q., Chenevier, M., Kassi, S., Jost, H.-J., and Romanini, D.: A water isotope
(<sup>2</sup>H, <sup>17</sup>O, and <sup>18</sup>O) spectrometer based on optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption for
in situ airborne applications, Appl. Phys. B, 85, 397–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2356-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2356-1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Kogelnik, H. and Li, T.: Laser beams and resonators, Appl. Optics, 5, 1550–1567,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.5.001550" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.5.001550</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Lechevallier, L., Grilli, R., Kerstel, E., Romanini, D., and Chappellaz, J.: Simultaneous detection of
C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>,  CH<sub>4</sub>,  and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C − CH<sub>4</sub> using optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption
spectroscopy in the mid-infrared region: towards application for dissolved gas measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12,
3101–3109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3101-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3101-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Long, D. A., Okumura, M., Miller, C. E., and Hodges, J. T.: Frequency-stabilized cavity ring-down
spectroscopy measurements of carbon dioxide isotopic ratios, Appl. Phys. B, 105, 471–477,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4518-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4518-z</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Manfred, K. M., Ciaffoni, L., and Ritchie, G. A. D.: Optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption
spectroscopy in a linear cavity: model and experiments, Appl. Phys. B, 120, 329–339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-015-6140-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-015-6140-y</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Masson-Delmotte, V.  P., Zhai, A., Pirani, S. L., Connors, C., Péan, S., Berger, N., Caud, Y.,
Chen, L., Goldfarb, M. I., Gomis, M., Huang, K., Leitzell, E., and Lonnoy, J.: IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The
Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       McManus, J. B., Kebabian, P. L., and Zahniser, M. S.: Astigmatic mirror multipass absorption cells for
long-path-length spectroscopy, Appl. Optics, 34, 3336–3348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.003336" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.003336</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       McManus, J. B.: Application of quantum cascade lasers to high-precision atmospheric trace gas measurements,
Opt. Eng., 49, 111124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3498782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3498782</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Morville, J., Kassi, S., Chenevier, M., and Romanini, D.: Fast, low-noise, mode-by-mode, cavity-enhanced
absorption spectroscopy by diode-laser self-locking, Appl. Phys. B, 80, 1027–1038, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-005-1828-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-005-1828-z</a>,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Morville, J., Romanini, D., Chenevier, M., and Kachanov, A.: Effects of laser phase noise on the injection
of a high-finesse cavity, Appl. Optics, 41, 6980–6990, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.006980" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.006980</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Myhre, G. D., Shindell, F.-M., Bréon, W., Collins, J., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, D., Koch, J.-F.,
Lamarque, D., Lee, B., Mendoza, T., Nakajima, A., Robock, G., Stephens, T., Takemura, T. and Zhang, H.: An thropogenic
and Natural Radiative Forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to
the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J.,
Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.,  Cambridge University Press,
659–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Nyquist, H.: Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory, Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng., 47, 617–644,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AIEE.1928.5055024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AIEE.1928.5055024</a>, 1928.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Ohshima, S. and Schnatz, H.: Optimization of injection current and feedback phase of an optically
self-locked laser diode, J. Appl. Phys., 71, 3114–3117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.351006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.351006</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       O'Keefe, A.: Integrated cavity output analysis of ultra-weak absorption, Chem. Phys. Lett., 293, 331–336,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00785-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00785-4</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Patimisco, P., Scamarcio, G., Tittel, F. K., and Spagnolo, V.: Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy:
a review, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 14, 6165–6206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s140406165" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/s140406165</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Quay, P., Stutsman, J., Wilbur, D., Snover, A., Dlugokencky, E., and Brown, T.: The isotopic composition of
atmospheric methane, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 445–461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GB900006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GB900006</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Schaefer, H., Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Veidt, C., Lassey, K. R., Brailsford, G. W., Bromley, T. M.,
Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., Levin, I., Lowe, D. C., Martin, R. J., Vaughn, B. H., and
White, J. W. C.: A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by <sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>,
Science (New York, NY), 352, 80–84, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2705</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Shannon, C. E.: Communication in the Presence of Noise, P. IRE, 37, 10–21,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969</a>, 1949.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Tuzson, B., Mohn, J., Zeeman, M. J., Werner, R. A., Eugster, W., Zahniser, M. S., Nelson, D. D.,
McManus, J. B., and Emmenegger, L.: High precision and continuous field measurements of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and
<i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O in carbon dioxide with a cryogen-free QCLAS, Appl. Phys. B, 92, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3085-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3085-4</a>,
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Werle, P., Mcke, R., and Slemr, F.: The limits of signal averaging in atmospheric trace-gas monitoring by
tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), Appl. Phys. B, 57, 131–139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425997" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425997</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Werle, P.: A review of recent advances in semiconductor laser based gas monitors, Spectrochim. Acta A, 54,
197–236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(97)00227-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(97)00227-8</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Zellweger, C., Emmenegger, L., Firdaus, M., Hatakka, J., Heimann, M., Kozlova, E., Spain, T. G.,
Steinbacher, M., van der Schoot, M. V., and Buchmann, B.: Assessment of recent advances in measurement techniques for
atmospheric carbon dioxide and methane observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4737–4757, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4737-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4737-2016</a>,
2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
