Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-403-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-403-2018
Regular research article
 | 
23 May 2018
Regular research article |  | 23 May 2018

Calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers in the low-frequency range – Part 2: Uncertainty assessment

Giulio D'Emilia, Antonella Gaspari, Fabrizio Mazzoleni, Emanuela Natale, and Alessandro Schiavi

Related authors

Metrological assessment of a robotic total station for use in post-earthquake emergency conditions
Giulio D'Emilia and Emanuela Natale
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 12, 187–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-12-187-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-12-187-2023, 2023
Short summary
Amplitude–phase calibration of tri-axial accelerometers in the low-frequency range by a LDV
Giulio D'Emilia, Antonella Gaspari, and Emanuela Natale
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 8, 223–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-223-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-223-2019, 2019
Short summary
Calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers in the low-frequency range – Part 1: comparison among methods
Giulio D'Emilia, Antonella Gaspari, Fabrizio Mazzoleni, Emanuela Natale, and Alessandro Schiavi
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 7, 245–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-245-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-245-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Sensor technologies: MEMS technology
Calibrating a high-speed contact-resonance profilometer
Michael Fahrbach, Sebastian Friedrich, Brunero Cappella, and Erwin Peiner
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 9, 179–187, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-179-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-179-2020, 2020
Short summary
Phase optimization of thermally actuated piezoresistive resonant MEMS cantilever sensors
Andi Setiono, Michael Fahrbach, Jiushuai Xu, Maik Bertke, Wilson Ombati Nyang'au, Gerry Hamdana, Hutomo Suryo Wasisto, and Erwin Peiner
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 8, 37–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-37-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-37-2019, 2019
Short summary
Calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers in the low-frequency range – Part 1: comparison among methods
Giulio D'Emilia, Antonella Gaspari, Fabrizio Mazzoleni, Emanuela Natale, and Alessandro Schiavi
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 7, 245–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-245-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-245-2018, 2018
Short summary
Concept for a MEMS-type vacuum sensor based on electrical conductivity measurements
Friederike Julia Giebel, Marcel Köhle, Till Stramm, Klaus T. Kallis, and Horst L. Fiedler
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 6, 367–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-6-367-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-6-367-2017, 2017
Short summary
Measurement and analysis of certain flight parameters based on MEMS sensors
Jerzy Bakunowicz and Paweł Rzucidło
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 6, 211–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-6-211-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-6-211-2017, 2017
Short summary

Cited articles

D'Emilia, G., Lucci, S., Natale, E., and Pizzicannella, F.: Validation of a Method for Composition Measurement of a Non-Standard Liquid Fuel for Emission Factor Evaluation, Measurement, 44, 18–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2010.08.016, 2011. 
D'Emilia, G., Gaspari, A., and Natale, E.: Dynamic Calibration Uncertainty of Three-Axis Low Frequency Accelerometers: Test Rig and Procedure Aspects, Acta IMEKO, 4, 75–81, https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v4i4.239, 2015. 
D'Emilia, G., Gaspari, A., and Natale, E.: Evaluation of aspects affecting measurement of three-axis accelerometers, Measurement, 77, 95–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.031, 2016a. 
D'Emilia, G., Di Gasbarro, D., Gaspari, A., and Natale, E.: Accuracy improvement in a calibration test bench for accelerometers by a vision system, Proc. Int. Conf. on Vibration Measurements by Laser and Noncontact Techniques: Advances and Applications (Ancona), 1740, 090003, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4952690, 2016b. 
D'Emilia, G., Gaspari, A., Mazzoleni, F., Natale, E., and Schiavi, A.: Calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers in the low-frequency range – Part 1: comparison among methods, J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 7, 245–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-245-2018, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
A comparison among three methods for the calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers is presented, paying attention to the uncertainty assessment of each method. The first method is performed according to the ISO 16063 standards. Two innovative methods are analysed, both suitable for in-field application. For each method, the main contributions to the measurement uncertainty have been identified and evaluated, in order to define their most suitable field of application.