Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-13-123-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-13-123-2024
Regular research article
 | 
04 Jun 2024
Regular research article |  | 04 Jun 2024

Integration and evaluation of the high-precision MotionCam-3D into a 3D thermography system

Miguel-David Méndez-Bohórquez, Sebastian Schramm, Robert Schmoll, and Andreas Kroll

Related authors

High-resolution characterization of the size-of-source effect via a continuously variable aperture
Miguel-David Mendez-Bohorquez, Robert Schmoll, and Andreas Kroll
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 15, 155–166, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-15-155-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-15-155-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexiou, E. and Ebrahimi, T.: On subjective and objective quality evaluation of point cloud geometry, in: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 1–3, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2017.7965681, 2017. a
Bin, Z., Jianxin, Q., Yunkang, S., Wentao, H., and Longqiu, L.: In situ monitoring of flip chip package process using thermal resistance network method and active thermography, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 225, 125402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.125402, 2024. a
Campione, I., Lucchi, F., Santopuoli, N., and Seccia, L.: 3D Thermal Imaging System with Decoupled Acquisition for Industrial and Cultural Heritage Applications, Appl. Sci., 10, 828, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030828, 2020. a
Costanzo, A., Minasi, M., Casula, G., Musacchio, M., and Buongiorno, M.: Combined Use of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and IR Thermography Applied to a Historical Building, Sensors, 15, 194–213, https://doi.org/10.3390/s150100194, 2014. a, b
Dumic, E., Duarte, C. R., and da Silva Cruz, L. A.: Subjective evaluation and objective measures for point clouds – State of the art, in: 2018 First International Colloquium on Smart Grid Metrology (SmaGriMet), 1–5, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/SMAGRIMET.2018.8369848, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
3D thermograms are a good alternative when a single traditional 2D thermal image does not reveal enough information to analyze a complex object. However, the 3D thermography field is still under exploration. This paper shows a comparison of a thermography system operated with two different 3D sensors. The results indicate that the depth sensor with more accurate measurements captures the object geometry better, and therefore the interpretation of the 3D thermograms is improved.
Share