Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-171-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-171-2019
Review paper
 | 
24 Apr 2019
Review paper |  | 24 Apr 2019

Inductive localization accuracy of a passive 3-D coil in an Industry 4.0 environment

Rafael Psiuk, Alfred Müller, Daniel Cichon, Albert Heuberger, Hartmut Brauer, and Hannes Töpfer

Cited articles

Arumugam, D., Griffin, J., and Stancil, D.: Magneto-Quasistatic Tracking of an American Football: A Goal-Line Measurement, IEEE Antenn. Propag. M, 55, 137–146, 2013. a, b
Arvo, J.: Fast random rotation matrices, in: Graphics Gems III (IBM Version), Academic Press, Cambridge, USA, 117–120, 1992. a
Baechler, A., Baechler, L., Autenrieth, S., Kurtz, P., Hoerz, T., Heidenreich, T., and Kruell, G.: A Comparative Study of an Assistance System for Manual Order Picking – Called Pick-by-Projection – with the Guiding Systems Pick-by-Paper, Pick-by-Light and Pick-by-Display, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, USA, 5–8 January, 523–531, 2016. a
Brauer, H., Haueisen, J., and Ziolkowski, M.: Verification of magnetic field tomography inverse problem solutions using physical phantoms, 6th International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics, Aachen, Germany, 4–6 April, 225–226, 2006. a
Bronshtein, I., Semendyayev, K., Musiol, G., and Mühlig, H.: Handbook of Mathematics, 4. edn., Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. a
Download
Short summary
In this article we have investigated how the arbitrary orientation of a passive localization object in a magnetic field affects that field. For that we have identified the two sources of uncertainty, the geometrical extent of the object and the field inhomogeneity, and have quantified their effect analytically. Based on that we have compared the performance of several localization algorithms on that field variation. Results show that a dipole model is sufficient for the localization algorithm.
Share